Only 24% of the registered voters voted in the election — in Duval County –that ended March 19th. Why so few?
Is it because news sources aren’t giving us enough information so that we’re uncomfortable voting? Here is a funny skit about that:
Or is it because people feel the majority always wins so why bother? If that is the reason then would proportional representation help?
Quote from https://www.fairvote.org/how_proportional_representation_elections_work:
Proportional representation systems have the goal of ensuring that more voters receive some representation. Various systems have different ways of achieving these goals.
Why not elect the 5 city council at large seats via a proportional representation system? For example, what about the following?
1. 10 candidates –with the most votes– win the unitary election for the at-large city council seats
2. Those 10 candidates run in the general election. The 5 candidates with the most votes would then serve as at-large city council representatives.
How do you think it would change if we got proportional representation? As it works now the majority get to pick all five at-large candidates. In the election that ended March 19, the starred ones (in the below list) got the most votes in each individual election race and (even though some face run offs) will probably be our at-large representatives:
**Lisa King , **Darren Mason, **Tommy Hazouri, **Matt Carlucci, **Samuel Newby, Gary Barrett, Connell A. Crooms, Jack Daniels, Terrance Freeman, Ron Salem, James C. Jacobs,Greg Rachal,Harold McCart, Don Redman, Niki Brunson, Chad Evan McIntyre.
I like the simple system that I stated above. I think single transferable vote is too complicated and doesn’t lend itself to easy auditing or recounts. Quote from this LINK to the wikipedia page about STV:
The single transferable vote (STV)is a voting system designed to achieve proportional representation through ranked voting in multi-seat organizations voting districts.
I went to a Socrates Cafe on March 20th and we discussed voting. The participants didn’t convince me that ranked voting for a single position made sense. This link https://www.fairvote.org/how_proportional_representation_elections_work offers a lot of options but they seem too complicated to me and I don’t see how they’ll solve the problem if there is still only ONE person to be chosen.
This Vox article talks about ranked choice voting. The advantage they point out is that the advertisements are less negative. Here is a quote from another ARTICLE from Vox explaining why they like San Francisco’s ranked choice system:
To “game” the system in a simple plurality-winner election, the basic strategy involves mobilizing your base while trying to tear down competing candidates. This involves lots of scorched-earth negative campaigning. To “game” the system in a ranked-choice voting election, the basic strategy is to try to appeal broadly and say, I’d like to be your first choice, but if I can’t be your first choice, I’d like to be your second choice. In ranked-choice voting, we’d expect soft alliances among candidates who realize that they’re both stronger through coalition building than they are by law-of-the-jungle campaigning
http://www.voteguy.com/rcv-academic/ is a link to a wonky examination of ranked choice voting. This white paper was mentioned in the Vox article.
Yea…less negative ads is appealing BUT if candidates can be nice then why won’t they do it no matter what kind of voting system we use? I worry about making the voting too complicated. According to this article Duval votes were lost due to voters completing their ballots incorrectly. My view is that we don’t need to make it more complicated.
Quote from this ARTICLE
… we know that voters often skip reading instructions. … people rush to mark their votes … Americans, including New Yorkers and Floridians, want their votes to count. Let’s help them do that with well-designed ballots that don’t create confusion, or worse — change the results of an election.
I think we need to trust our voting machines before we make voting more complicated. Quote from this article:
It is also important to ensure the scans are accurate by checking a good sample against the original paper ballots.
Quote from this article:
Florida law requires a sample of ballots to be hand-audited after each election to ensure accuracy.